\n\n

8000 Tax Credit Bridge Loan For Down Payment Assistance: A Possibility?

May 15, 2009 · 12 comments

This week in a prepared speech given to the National Association of Realtors , Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Shaun Donovan either dropped a bombshell or let something slip regarding the possibility of “monetizing the 8000 tax credit” where people could use the 8000 tax credit (in essence) for their down payment.

The problem here was that details would be forthcoming – as in nothing is final yet.

But already, we are starting to see that “non profit” organizations are announcing the availability of the program where people can “monetize” their tax credit and use it as a down payment in the form of a “bridge loan”. Fun!

What HUD Secretary actually said (an excerpt from his speech):

And we are taking action to further help the housing market recover. I’m excited to announce here at NAR that FHA’s policy on the “monetization” of the first-time homebuyer tax credit will soon be published. I know that you’ve been waiting anxiously to hear FHA’s position on the matter. We, like you, believe that this new tax credit is not only a tremendous opportunity for first-time homebuyers, but also an enormous benefit for communities struggling to deal with an oversupply of housing. According to estimates by the National Association of Home Builders, this new tax credit will stimulate 160,000 home sales across the nation – 101,000 of which will be first time buyers who will receive the credit. Another 59,000 existing homeowners will be able to buy another home because a first time buyer purchased their home.

We all want to enable FHA consumers to access the tax credit funds when they close on their home loans so that the cash can be used as a downpayment. So FHA will permit trusted FHA-approved lenders and HUD-approved nonprofits, as well as state and local governmental entities to “monetize” the tax credit through short-term bridge loans. We think the policy is a real win for everyone, ensuring that borrowers can tap into the numerous organizations that are already part of the FHA network to receive this additional benefit. FHA will be publishing the details shortly.

My Translation:

Remember back in October when legislators got rid of the “down payment assistance” programs and gave the reasoning behind it that defaults for people who used down payment assistance programs were “higher than normal”? If this idea happens in some form — any form — what it is doing in essence is bringing back a form of down payment assistance that allows people to move into homes with “no money down”.

Is the “monetization of the 8000 tax credit in the form of a bridge loan” a bad idea?

Yes.

For two reasons.

  1. This “bridge loan” idea comes at an abnormally high price to the consumer (as in the interest rate could easily approach 100% on an annualized basis).
  2. If the statistics say that the down payment assistance programs resulted in abnormal default rates, any variation of this proposed idea is essentially “bringing the DPA back” and I once learned that insanity was doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.

Do I really care?

No, not really. A few billion here or there in today’s legislative world doesn’t really get me all worked up anymore. I have almost forgotten how many zeros are in a Billion. I am going to spend my time trying to help as many people who haven’t saved up enough money for a 3.5% down payment a bridge loan with a 100% interest rate!

I get paid on commission you know.

And yes, I will be sure to keep you posted on what whatever-the-final-version-of-the-monetization-of-the-8000-tax-credit-that-gets-released is.

Scottsdale Mortgage Rates May 15 2009

Current Mortgage Rates Mortgages, Home Loans, and Mortgage Quotes at Zillow Mortgage Marketplace Get this widget See local rates

If you enjoyed this post, consider subscribing to the blog

{ 2 trackbacks }

Posts about Home Sales as of May 15, 2009 | Real Estate Market Reports
May 15, 2009 at 11:01 am
8000 Tax Credit Bridge Loan For Down Payment and Closing Costs: Now Reality | Phoenix Area Real Estate Blog
May 31, 2009 at 2:52 pm

{ 10 comments }

1 Kyle Pearson May 15, 2009 at 10:32 am

I have yet to read a blog, article, or newspaper that shows the people who are happy about the Obama Machine printing a trillion dollars here or there. In fact, anything that isn’t mainstream media looks like NOBODY wants this spending. Well, I guess that when the president is the media’s baby you get to overlook certain facts, like the feelings of the American people.

2 Steve Belt May 15, 2009 at 11:21 am

Kyle, if the spending programs actually put people to work, I’ll start singing a more positive tune. Even though it means a significant sharing of wealth, at least the money would have some tangible benefit I would hope I can point to and say, “I built that”.

I’m not sure what “that” is, but for a few trillion dollars, we should be able to build some pretty cool stuff. You know…stuff like the Hoover Dam, Mount Rushmore, the Golden Gate Bridge…little things like that.

3 Dru Bloomfield May 18, 2009 at 6:09 am

I’m not following on the 100% interest rate. How does that work?

4 Justin McHood May 18, 2009 at 9:54 am

Hi Dru,

Sorry, I should have been more clear on that one.

Let me say first that to my knowledge, nothing is still official on this, so I could be giving bad information on this “bridge loan” that turns out to not even be real.

But — there isn’t really an interest rate per se — just a “fee” for providing the bridge loan which is backed by the federal government, so there really is no default risk.

Let’s say that someone decided they wanted to “monetize” their tax credit and participate in one of these bridge loan programs. For this example, let’s say they were buying a $100,000 house and needed $3,500 for their down payment.

To borrow that $3,500, they agree to pay $500.

The person who loaned the $3,500 gets the $3,500 back in 1 month and for loaning them the money, they receive $500.

So in this example, if you said that someone borrowing $3,500 and paying $500 to borrow it for one month — the interest rate would be even considerably higher than 100%.

But I used 100% to be conservative.

Let’s see how it all plays out. If it has become official, I am not yet aware of it — so who knows.

Justin

5 Dru Bloomfield May 18, 2009 at 9:39 pm

Justin,

I’ll be looking to you for more info as it comes in.

6 Justin McHood May 18, 2009 at 9:45 pm

Deal.

Here is the latest — I feel like I have leaned and been slapped.

http://www.zillow.com/blog/mortgage/2009/05/18/8000-tax-credit-bridge-loan-lean-and-slap/

Justin

7 Brandon May 19, 2009 at 4:27 pm

There’s another way to look at all this. If you can’t afford a down payment, you shouldn’t be buying a home. The notion of “home ownership for everyone” is mainly what led to the housing mess we are in right now. Jeez, how soon we forget. Does anybody else see where this is going? :-) Slow the ride down, I want to get off. Nice blogging! Take care. ~Brandon

8 Michelle June 1, 2009 at 10:23 pm

Any updates?

9 Justin McHood June 1, 2009 at 10:30 pm
10 Michael Smith June 29, 2009 at 5:52 pm

Wow Justin, thanks for all the info. Will keep an eye on this.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: